IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 165-166 OF 2011
Sunil Damodar Gaikwad … Appellant (s)
Versus
State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Para 18 of Judgement
18. When there are binding decisions, judicial comity expects
and requires the same to be followed. Judicial comity is an
integral part of judicial discipline and judicial discipline the
cornerstone of judicial integrity. No doubt, in case there are
newer dimensions not in conflict with the ratio of larger
bench decisions or where there is anything to be added to
and explained, it is always permissible to introduce the
same.
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 165-166 OF 2011
Sunil Damodar Gaikwad … Appellant (s)
Versus
State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Para 18 of Judgement
18. When there are binding decisions, judicial comity expects
and requires the same to be followed. Judicial comity is an
integral part of judicial discipline and judicial discipline the
cornerstone of judicial integrity. No doubt, in case there are
newer dimensions not in conflict with the ratio of larger
bench decisions or where there is anything to be added to
and explained, it is always permissible to introduce the
same.
No comments:
Post a Comment