Monday 15 July 2019

Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 
OVERVIEW OF 
“REVENUE DEPARTMENT”
HISTORY :- 
CHIEF COMMISSIONERATE / TELANGANA BOARD OF REVENUE / THE BOARD 
OF REVENUE IN ANDHRA PRADESH / COMMISSIONERS ACT 1977 / THE 
PRESENT SET UP 
HISTORY 
 The history of Land Administration dates back to the olden days of kings and 
Kingdoms. The Land Revenue was the major source of revenue for the kings. The 
present system of preparing and maintaining land records originated from the 
Moghul period and it reached its scientific form during the British rule. 
During the British times the Revenue Department was the pivot of Administration. 
The Board of Revenue that wielded extraordinary powers administered it. The 
Collector was the virtual monarch at the District. 
MADRAS BOARD OF REVENUE 
 In Andhra area the Board of Revenue was established in Madras State 
in1786 with the sanction of the Court of Directors of East India Company. The Board 
subject to the control of Governor had to superintend the whole administration, 
collect revenue and control subordinates. It marked the beginning of 
departmentalizing the functions of Government. 
The Revenue Regulation in 1803 de linked administration of Civil Justice from
Board. It gave statutory foundation to the Board and spelled out its main duties like 
Collection of Revenue, recommending sources for augmenting the income of the 
Government and punishing the subordinate. 
In 1849 decentralization was introduced. The Board of Revenue Act 1883 
dispensed with the Collective nature of the Board. Each member was assigned
some subjects and his orders were treated as those of the board. In 1894 the Board 
received operational freedom when the condition that all the orders given by Board 
need Government approval to be effective was dispensed. Senior members of ICS 
were selected as members. 
The Board seems to have received a setback from 1916 to 1926 when its 
jurisdiction shrank. Separate Departments were constituted and certain sources of 
Revenue were transferred to Center. However from 1937 it regained its importance. 
Further in the wake of Independence it was asked to coordinate Food Production, 
Community Development and National Extension Service. 
ANDHRA BOARD OF REVENUE 
 With the formation of separate Andhra State the Andhra Board of Revenue 
was formed in 1953. It was a replica of Madras board. But it has only 2 members 
where as Madras Board has 5 members drawn from ICS. It was the link between 
the Government and the Districts. The first member was senior even to the then 
Chief Secretary to Government. 2 
TELANGANA BOARD OF REVENUE 
 The Prime Minister of Hyderabad, Sir Salar Jung, constituted a board of 
revenue for the first time in 1864.In 1885 it was abolished and Inspector General at 
State Level was appointed. In 1893, the assistant Minister of revenue, Vkar-ul￾Umra, was appointed as the Prime Minister and to fill this gap a Revenue Board 
was created for the third time. It was abolished in 1901 and the post of Revenue 
Secretary was revived. He was also designated as Director General of Revenue in 
1928. Thus the Secretariat and executive functions were combined. This 
arrangement continued till 1945 when the Board of Revenue was created for the 
fourth time purely as an appellate body. Its life ended by 1949.Meanwhile 
Hyderabad merged with the Union of India. 
Then for the fifth time the board of Revenue in erstwhile State of Hyderabad was 
established under a Regulation issued in 1949. (Regulation LX of 1358 Fasli). The 
Hyderabad board as it existed in 1956 was by and large modeled on Madras
pattern. However it had four members who were Secretaries to Government 
whereas in Madras they were seniors to Secretaries though next to Chief Secretary. 
The Senior Member of the Telangana Board functioned also as the Development 
Commissioner and was designated as ex officio Secretary to Government. 
THE BOARD OF REVENUE IN ANDHRA PRADESH 
 The integrated Board of Andhra Pradesh, constituted on Madras pattern 
enjoyed some of the powers of Hyderabad Board also. It administered through the 
Board Standing Orders that form the basis of administration even till today. It 
consisted of five members. In 1957 National savings Scheme was put under its 
charge. It lost its control over minor irrigation in 1962 and Endowments in 1964.The 
Panchayat Raj was withdrawn in 1970. But Tribal Welfare and PWD were added 
under its control as a coordinating agency. 
Gradually the Board lost its position as the highest Revenue Court. In some matters 
Board Standing orders were altered by statutory amendments. Again Special 
Secretaries to Government were created in1961 and Board lost its distinction as the 
only administrative body with senior most officers though Chief Secretaries were 
drawn from the Board Members. 
In the Revenue Department, Commissioner of Revenue assisted the Board of 
Revenue in its functioning. Secretary, Board’s Land revenue and irrigation Branch, 
in turn assisted the Commissioner. At the District Level District Collectors, District 
Revenue Officers performed the revenue and administrative functions. Revenue 
Divisional Officers and Sub Collectors at the Sub-Divisional Level, Tahsildars and 
Deputy Tahsildars at the Tahsil Level, 3
exercised the powers of Members. 
THE PRESENT SET UP 
 In 1999 the posts of Commissioners, Survey Settlement & Land Records and 
Land reforms & Urban land Ceiling were abolished. The post of Commissioner of 
Land Revenue was re designated as Chief Commissioner of Land Administration. 
Commissioner Appeals in a Cadre post of I.A.S and Commissioner Legal affairs in 
the cadre of District and Sessions judge were also created to assist the Chief 
Commissioner of Land administration. 
ADMINISTRATIVE SETUP :- 
CHIEF COMMISSIONERATE / COLLECTORATES / SUB DIVISIONAL 
OFFICES / MANDAL REVENUE OFFICES / PANCHAYAT SECRETARIES 
ADMINISTRATIVE SETUP 
 In the organization of Revenue Department the apex body of 
administration is the head office of Chief Commissioner of Land 
Administration at State Level. But the core administration is carried out at 
Districts that have direct interface with public. For administrative convenience 
the District is divided into Sub Divisions, which are further divided into 
Mandals that have jurisdiction over a few villages. The present set up of 
revenue administration consists of the following hierarchy of Officials. 
 Chief Commissionerate at State Level 
 Collectorates at District Level.
 Divisional Officers at Revenue Divisional Level.
 Tahsildars at Mandal Level. 
 Village Revenue Officer at Village Level.
At the Mandal level the Mandal Development Officer (MDO) takes care of the 
development activities. 
CHIEF COMMISSIONERATE 
 Consequent on the abolition of the erstwhile Board of Revenue, the 
functional Commissioners of Survey, Settlement & Land Records and 
Commissioner of Land Reforms & Urban Land Ceiling were created. 
Subsequently they were replaced. In their place, the post of Chief 
Commissioner of Land Administration was created in GO MS No: 59 
Revenue (DA) Dated 21.01.1999. 
The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA) is the chief 
controlling authority for the revenue administration consisting of Revenue, 
Survey, Settlement & Land Records and Urban Land Ceiling Departments. 
He exercises statutory functions and general superintendence over all his 
subordinates. In the case of Survey, Settlement & Land Records and Urban  Inspectors and Girdwars at the 
Firka/ Circle Level, and Village Officers and Village Servants at the Village Level 
assisted the Collector. 
COMMISSIONERS ACT 1977 
 The Board of Revenue was abolished by the A .P. Board of Revenue 
Replacement by Commissioners Act, 1977.As per this new Act Commissioners 
were appointed in place of MembÄ·ers. The Commissioner of Land Revenue, 
Commissioner of Survey and Settlement, commissioner of Excise, Commissioner of 
Commercial Taxes and Commissioner Land Reforms and Urban Land Ceiling 

Desist from addressing Judges as "My Lord", "Your Lordship": Rajasthan HC Full Court



In a marked departure from one of the long-standing colonial traditions that continue to characterise the Indian Judiciary, the Full Court of the Rajasthan High Court has resolved to do away with the practice of referring to judges as "My Lord" and "Your Lordship".
Following a Full Court meeting held on Sunday, a notification has been issued by the  Rajasthan High Court Registrar General today, stating the following:
"To honour the mandate of equality enshrined in the Constitution of India, the Full Court in its meeting dated 14.07.2019 has unanimously resolved to request the counsels and those who appear before the Court to desist from addressing the Hon’ble Judges as ‘My Lord’ and ‘Your Lordship’."
It may be noted that the current Bar Council of India (BCI) rules also do not mandate the use of "My Lord" and "Your Lordship" when it comes to addressing the members of the Bench. In this regard, Chapter III A of Part VI of the BCI Rules lays down the following when it comes to the manner in which the Court must be addressed:
"Consistent with the obligation of the Bar to show a respectful attitude towards the Court and bearing in mind the dignity of Judicial Office, the form of address to be adopted whether in the Supreme Court, High Courts or Subordinate Courts should be as follows: “Your Honour” or “Hon'ble Court” in Supreme Court & High Courts and in the Subordinate Courts and Tribunals it is open to the Lawyers to address the Court as “Sir” or the equivalent word in respective regional languages."
Notably, an explanation to this provision specifically refers to the usage of "Lord" and "Lordship" as relics of the colonial pasts.
"EXPLANATION: As the words “My Lord” and “Your Lordship” are relics of Colonial post, it is proposed to incorporate the above rule showing respectful attitude to the Court."
A similar observation was made by the Supreme Court itself back in 2014. A PIL moved by an advocate, Shiv Sagar Tiwari to do away with the practice of addressing judges as “Your Lordship” and “My Lord”, had prompted a Bench of Justices HL Dattu and SA Bobde to point out that it was not compulsory to address the Court as "My Lord", "Your Lordship" or even "Your Honour”.
While dismissing the PIL, the Bench said,
"When did we say it is compulsory? You can only call us in a dignified manner.... "How can this negative prayer be accepted by us? Don't address us as “lordship”. We don't say anything. We only say address us respectfully."
The topic briefly propped up during court proceedings in the Madras High Court last year as well. While cautioning a litigant - who had appeared in person to argue his case - to address the Court respectfully, a Madras High Court judge orally observed,
"You need not address us as 'Your Lordships' either, it is part of the colonial mindset, we also don't like it. Just address us as 'the Court'"