Without there being any
physical formal partition of an undivided landed property, a co-sharer cannot
put a vendee in possession although such a co-sharer may have a right to
transfer his undivided share. Reliance in this regard may be placed to a
decision of the Court in M.V.S. Manikayala Rao v. M. Narasimhaswami and Others;
AIR 1966 SC 470, wherein the Court stated as follows:
“Now, it is well settled that the purchaser of a
co parcener’s undivided interest in the joint family property is not entitled
to possession of what he had purchased. His only right is to sue for partition
of the property and ask for allotment to him of that which, on partition, might
be found to fall to the share of the coparcener whose share he had purchased.” (Ramdas
v. Sitabai & Others; 2009(107) RD 780IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS(WHERE PUBLIC INTEREST IS AT LARGE)AND CIRCULARS OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT WILL BE POSTED IN THIS BLOG FOR USE OF STAKE HOLDERS OF LEGAL FRATERNITY
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
PRACTICAL ADVOCATE
"THE PRACTICAL ADVOCATE: A GUIDE TO CIVIL PLEADINGS, DRAFTING, AND COURTROOM PRACTICE "BY ...
-
Steps in Execution Written execution petition will be in the form signed and verified by the applicant or by some other person pro...
-
Telangana High Court Judgment No.1 Logeti Pedda Bhojanna vs Mahajah Ravinder, on 28 November, 2024 THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE K....

No comments:
Post a Comment