Without there being any
physical formal partition of an undivided landed property, a co-sharer cannot
put a vendee in possession although such a co-sharer may have a right to
transfer his undivided share. Reliance in this regard may be placed to a
decision of the Court in M.V.S. Manikayala Rao v. M. Narasimhaswami and Others;
AIR 1966 SC 470, wherein the Court stated as follows:
“Now, it is well settled that the purchaser of a
co parcener’s undivided interest in the joint family property is not entitled
to possession of what he had purchased. His only right is to sue for partition
of the property and ask for allotment to him of that which, on partition, might
be found to fall to the share of the coparcener whose share he had purchased.” (Ramdas
v. Sitabai & Others; 2009(107) RD 780IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS(WHERE PUBLIC INTEREST IS AT LARGE)AND CIRCULARS OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT WILL BE POSTED IN THIS BLOG FOR USE OF STAKE HOLDERS OF LEGAL FRATERNITY
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Steps in Execution Written execution petition will be in the form signed and verified by the applicant or by some other person pro...
-
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO Civil Revision Petition No.1913 of 2006 20-06-2006 Lokara Om Kumar, S/o.late Amarn...
-
1] Suit based on Demand Promissory note for Recovery Money:- Court Fee :- Advalorem Fees U/Sec.20 of A....
No comments:
Post a Comment