Whether son and grandson have right in property which father got in partition?
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Appeal No. 5415 of 2011
Decided On: 02.07.2018
Shyam Narayan Prasad Vs. Krishna Prasad and Ors.
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Abhay Manohar Sapre and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ.
Citation: (2018) 7 SCC 646
Therefore, the properties acquired by Defendant No. 2 in the partition dated 31.07.1987 although are separate property qua other relations but it is a coparcenary property insofar as his sons and grandsons are concerned. In the instant case, there is a clear finding by the trial court that the properties are ancestral properties which have been divided as per the deed of partition dated 31.07.1987. The property which had fallen to the share of Defendant No. 2 retained the character of a coparcenary property and the Plaintiffs being his sons and grandson have a right in the said property. Hence, it cannot be said that the suit filed by the Plaintiffs was not maintainable.
Shyam Narayan Prasad Vs. Krishna Prasad and Ors.
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Abhay Manohar Sapre and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ.
Citation: (2018) 7 SCC 646
No comments:
Post a Comment