Frivolous applications not to be entertained In the case of S.K. Lal vs. Ministry of Railways (Appeal No. CIC /OK /A / 2006 /00268-272, dt: 29.12.2006) the applicant had filed five applications to the railway authorities asking for “ all the records” regarding various services and categories of staff in the Railways. The public authority, however, did not provide him with the information requested. DECISION: The Central Information Commission observed that though the RTI Act allows citizen to seek any information other than the 10 categories exempted under Section 8, it does not mean that the public authorities are required to entertain to all sort of frivolous applications. The CIC held that asking for “all the records” regarding various services and categories of staff in the railways, “only amounts to making a mockery of the Act
IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS(WHERE PUBLIC INTEREST IS AT LARGE)AND CIRCULARS OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT WILL BE POSTED IN THIS BLOG FOR USE OF STAKE HOLDERS OF LEGAL FRATERNITY
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A BRIEF NOTE ON THAT PROVIDES OVERVIEW OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (RFCTLARR), (CENTRAL ACT) AND THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (TELANGANA AMENDMENT) ACT, 2016 (NOTIFIED AS ACT 21 OF 2017) DESIGNED FOR LEGAL PRACTITIONERS
A BRIEF NOTE ON THAT PROVIDES OVERVIEW OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLE...
-
Steps in Execution Written execution petition will be in the form signed and verified by the applicant or by some other person pro...
-
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 325-326 OF 2015 [Arising out of Special Leave Petiti...

No comments:
Post a Comment